Why Penalty Shootouts Are Less Random Than Fans Think
After every tournament knockout decided on penalties, someone in the pub says the same thing: it is a lottery. The losing manager usually says it too, in the press conference.

After every tournament knockout decided on penalties, someone in the pub says the same thing: it is a lottery. The losing manager usually says it too, in the press conference. It is a comforting idea, because it means nobody is really to blame. It is also, for the most part, wrong.
Penalty shootouts contain a lot of luck. But they contain much more skill, preparation and psychology than the lottery label suggests, and the teams that treat them as a lottery tend to lose them.
Where the lottery idea comes from
A shootout feels random because the margins are so small. A ball hits the inside of the post and goes in, or hits the outside and goes wide. A keeper guesses right and gets a fingertip to it, or guesses wrong by a yard. Over just five kicks each, those small margins decide everything.
Supporters also experience shootouts in a way that encourages the lottery view. Many fans in my local club's supporters' group put a small stake on knockout matches, whether in an office pool or on sites like ankertoto, and when a match goes to penalties most of them simply shrug and say it is fifty fifty now. It is an understandable reaction, and for a single shootout between two unprepared teams, it is not far from the truth. The interesting question is how prepared teams change those odds.
What the evidence says
Researchers have studied thousands of penalties from professional matches. Several findings come up again and again.
| Finding | What it suggests |
|---|---|
| Around three quarters of penalties are scored in shootouts | The taker has a large advantage if the kick is well executed |
| Kicks aimed high and near the post are rarely saved | Placement is a skill that can be trained |
| Players who rush their kick after the whistle miss more often | Routine and composure matter |
| Keepers dive before the kick on most penalties | Keepers can study a taker's habits and guess more accurately |
| Pressure effects are strongest on kicks where a miss means elimination | Psychology, not only technique, decides outcomes |
None of this removes luck. It shows that luck sits on top of a foundation of skill, and teams can build that foundation.
How prepared teams tilt the odds
The teams with the best shootout records tend to share a few habits.
- They practice under pressure, not just by kicking balls at an empty goal after training, but with the walk from the halfway line, a crowd noise track and consequences for missing.
- They pick takers on evidence, using practice conversion rates and composure under pressure, not seniority or reputation.
- Takers have a fixed routine: the same run up, the same pause, the same breathing, every time.
- Keepers study data on the likely takers, including preferred sides and how they react to a keeper's movements.
- They plan the order rather than letting it form in the moment.
Coaching this at youth level is as important as at the top. What separates a promising trialist from a squad player looks at composure more generally, and the same qualities show up in who scores penalties.
The idea I disagree with: penalties are just a lottery
The lottery claim is not just inaccurate. It is harmful, because it gives teams a reason not to prepare. If shootouts are pure chance, why spend training time on them? Several national teams held exactly that view for years and lost shootout after shootout, before changing their approach and improving their records sharply.
I would put it this way. A single shootout between two evenly prepared teams is close to a coin flip. A shootout between a prepared team and an unprepared one is not. The lottery label describes the result after preparation has been equalized, not the whole contest.
It also lets individual players off lightly in the wrong way, and too hard in another. A player who misses is told it was bad luck, which does not help them improve. Or they are blamed personally, when the real failure was a club that never practiced the situation properly.
Where luck still matters
None of this means a well prepared team always wins. Luck still plays a real part:
- A shot hits the woodwork rather than going in by a centimeter.
- A keeper guesses correctly on a well struck kick.
- The coin toss decides which team kicks first, and some studies suggest a small advantage to going first.
- A slip on the penalty spot, a gust of wind, a bobble.
The point is not that luck disappears. It is that preparation reduces how much of the outcome luck controls. That is the same idea behind why luck gets blamed for what is actually preparation, applied to the most dramatic moment in the game.
The next time a knockout goes to penalties, watch the takers' walk, their run up and the keeper's movement before each kick. You will see more planning than chance. More on the tactical side of the game is in our Match Tactics section.
More in Match Tactics
Match Tactics
What Esports Discipline Teaches Football Coaches
My nephew got me watching Counter-Strike 2 matches about a year ago, mostly because he wanted someone to argue with about a...
Match Tactics
Reading a Low Block Without Losing Patience
We once had sixty eight percent possession against a team sitting in a deep, compact low block, completed over six hundred...
Match Tactics
How a Back Three Changes What Your Wingers Can Do
The first time I switched a struggling team to a back three midseason, I expected the biggest change to show up in defense,...